21 Mar
2012
21 Mar
'12
2:31 p.m.
Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is steady and rock solid enough for
me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the impression
that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
21 Mar
21 Mar
3:32 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 6:31:25 am Lisi wrote:
Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is steady and
rock solid enough
for me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the
impression that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
i am using 3.5.12 as my main workstation, I have had more success with it.
Not sure if the TDE repo's have been updtated with Slávek Banko's fixes for
3.5.13. If not, a user would have to add an extra sources.list entry, which they
would have to find.. it is not on the TDE page, afaikt.
--
Peace,
Greg
3:46 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On 21 March 2012 11:32, Greg Madden <gomadtroll(a)gci.net> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 6:31:25 am Lisi wrote:
I am using 3.5.13 with Slavek Banko's fixes branch. This has been very
stable for me.
Calvin
Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is
steady and rock solid enough
for me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the
impression that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
i am using 3.5.12 as my main workstation, I have had more success with it.
Not sure if the TDE repo's have been updtated with Slávek Banko's fixes for
3.5.13. If not, a user would have to add an extra sources.list entry, which they
would have to find.. it is not on the TDE page, afaikt.
--
Peace,
Greg
6:42 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On 21/03/12 15:46, Calvin Morrison wrote:
On 21 March 2012 11:32, Greg
Madden<gomadtroll(a)gci.net> wrote:
3.5.13 on 3 machines here upgraded with all Slavek's fixes, works great
https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/axis
David
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 6:31:25 am Lisi wrote:
I am using 3.5.13 with Slavek Banko's fixes branch. This has been very
stable for me.
Calvin Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is
steady and rock solid enough
for me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the
impression that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
i am using 3.5.12 as my main workstation, I have had more success with it.
Not sure if the TDE repo's have been updtated with Slávek Banko's fixes for
3.5.13. If not, a user would have to add an extra sources.list entry, which they
would have to find.. it is not on the TDE page, afaikt.
--
Peace,
Greg
7:50 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On 03/21/2012 08:32 AM, Greg Madden wrote:
Not sure if the TDE repo's have been updtated with
Slávek Banko's fixes
for 3.5.13.
Any chance someone can give an "official" answer to this?
On a related note, given the problems many have had with 3.5.13, I think it
would be a good idea to have instructions to install 3.5.12 on current
distros like Oneiric, Squeeze, etc. If new users install "stable" 3.5.13
and have the problems many of us have had, many of them will never try
Trinity again.
--
PGP key: http://homestead-products.com/pubkey.htm
7:58 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 20:50:03 Dan Youngquist wrote:
On a related note, given the problems many have had
with 3.5.13, I think it
would be a good idea to have instructions to install 3.5.12 on current
distros like Oneiric, Squeeze, etc. If new users install "stable" 3.5.13
and have the problems many of us have had, many of them will never try
Trinity again.
I think the main problems with 3.5.13 were the repo failures due to server
problems short after 3.5.13 was out.
3.5.13 as such is more functional (e.g. flash plugin in konqueror working)
than 3.5.12.
at least, this is my experience.
werner
22 Mar
22 Mar
12:16 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 19:58:40 Werner Joss wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 20:50:03 Dan Youngquist
wrote:
I very strongly agree with Dan about this.
I wouldn't describe the the repo/mirror problems, soon after 3.5.13 was
released, as an issue with 3.5.13 itself; that was just a bit frustrating for
those of us waiting to try out 3.5.13. Far more important was the
KDM-greeter cpu race condition (bug 690), which was a complete a show stopper
for anyone hit by it (which seemed to be the majority of us).
The mirrors do not appear to have been updated since the initial release of
3.5.13 (dates and versions are unchanged) so anyone installing it is very
likely to be hit by 690 and, not knowing how to regress to 3.5.12, will
simply uninstall it and try something else.
In view of this, leaving the installation instructions as they are and telling
Squeeze users to install 3.5.13 seems extremely unwise.
In addition, on the three systems I tried it on (two i386 + one amd64) ,
ksysguard didn't detect the (lm-sensors) hardware sensors, which is also
quite a big issue for me.
LeeE
On a related note, given the problems many have
had with 3.5.13, I think
it would be a good idea to have instructions to install 3.5.12 on current
distros like Oneiric, Squeeze, etc. If new users install "stable" 3.5.13
and have the problems many of us have had, many of them will never try
Trinity again.
I think the main problems with 3.5.13 were the repo failures due to server
problems short after 3.5.13 was out.
3.5.13 as such is more functional (e.g. flash plugin in konqueror working)
than 3.5.12.
at least, this is my experience.
werner
23 Mar
23 Mar
8:25 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 19:58:40 Werner Joss wrote:
3.5.13 as such is more functional (e.g. flash plugin
in konqueror working)
than 3.5.12.
Does this mean that flash plugin does not work in 3.5.12?
Lisi
9:33 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Friday 23 March 2012 12:25:35 am Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 19:58:40 Werner Joss
wrote:
'nspluginviewer' crahshes here on flash sites, TDE 3.5.12. Long standing problem
with Konqueror, nspluginviewer & flash. i use Mozilla products to watch my flash
content.
--
Peace,
Greg
3.5.13 as such is more functional (e.g. flash
plugin in konqueror
working) than 3.5.12.
Does this mean that flash plugin does not work in 3.5.12?
Lisi
21 Mar
21 Mar
7:42 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 14:31:25 Lisi wrote:
Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is steady and
rock solid enough
for me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the
impression that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
Using 3.5.12 on three systems (two of which are only accessed via vnc) with no
major problems. I'll wait for an official update to 3.5.13 before I try it
again.
LeeE
7:46 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-users] Trinity 10.5.12 for Debian Squeeze
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 19:42:50 leee wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 14:31:25 Lisi wrote:
Forgot to mention that all three are on up to date Debian Squeeze, one amd64
with a 2.6.32 kernel and two i386 with 3.2.4 kernels (from squeeze
backports).
LeeE
Is the consensus of opinion that 10.5.12 is
steady and rock solid enough
for me it give it to someone else (a definite non-geek)? I get the
impression that 10.5.13 is still not bug-free enough for Just Using.
Thanks,
Lisi
Using 3.5.12 on three systems (two of which are only accessed via vnc) with
no major problems. I'll wait for an official update to 3.5.13 before I try
it again.
LeeE
4421
days inactive
4423
days old
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Calvin Morrison -
Dan Youngquist -
David Hare -
Greg Madden -
leee -
Lisi -
Werner Joss