tde-devels April 2013

devels@trinitydesktop.org

13 participants
66 discussions

by Baron

Hi Tim & All, On Saturday 06 April 2013 03:59:48 Timothy Pearson wrote: > Hi all, > > After discussions with the core development team, I have realised > that I owe everybody a long overdue update regarding Trinity. > > I apologise for the relatively long term silence on these mailing > lists. Like most people, I have to work in order to keep the lights > on and the servers humming, and these commitments have taken time > away from TDE. In particular over the past several months I have not > had any spare time to dedicate to TDE, which is why most development > (other than Slavek's tireless patching) had appeared to grind to a > halt. > > The good news is that the work which had been taking most of my time > is now easing up. I am currently diving into the bugtracker and am > currently focused on getting R14.0.0 stabilized and ready to ship. > > Thanks to several other dedicated individuals involved in the Trinity > project, progress has continued while I was away. R14.0.0 is looking > good overall, and the R14.0.0 road map and long term TDE road maps > have been updated on the Etherpad to more accurately reflect our > goals. > > Despite my absence I am encouraged that TDE will continue to move > forward. > > After some discussions with the core developers of TDE, I have begun > to realise that the project's top priority from now on needs to be > resolving bug reports. Other work will continue, including > enhancements and feature requests, but bug quashing will need to > remain a top priority to ensure TDE's survival and success. > > Secondly, Trinity has much in common with other "secondary" desktop > environments. We never will have the developer power or userbase of > KDE, GNOME, or Unity, but like our cousin "secondary" desktops, TDE > has a vtal role to play in the free/libre software world. We should > strive for excellence within our particular software design model, > and not worry so much about what the Big Three desktops are doing at > any given instant. > > My motivation for using and developing Trinity is to create a desktop > that functions the way I think it should function. How people believe > a desktop should function varies widely and this is why so many > exist, along with many window managers. The Trinity philosophy does > not embrace certain popular elements now available in other desktops, > and those elements are unlikely to ever become a part of Trinity. > That kind of focus is neither "bad" nor "good." We live in a large, > varied world and there is plenty of room for all of these varying > opinions and designs. This is also part of the method why free/libre > software will succeed in the long run: by encouraging choice and > freedom of opinions. > > Continuing Trinity is not about "us" versus "them"; instead, we are > simply exercising our freedom of choice by improving our software as > we see fit. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Thank you so much for being patient the past several months. I know > it was difficult for many of you, but rest assured that work on TDE > will pick up again, especially with your continuing support! > > Timothy Pearson > Trinity Desktop Project Seconded: I would like to add my thanks to all those developers for their good work. They are achieving things that I am not able or skilled enough to assist with. My gratitude to them is well deserved. Thanks guys ! -- Best Regards: Baron

11 years, 7 months

Re: [trinity-devel] Problem with URL links

by Darrell Anderson

On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:12:06 -0500 "Jean Milot" <milot.jean(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I have set Iceweasel to open URL link. > >If i create a link on my desktop (right clic), i can't open it if >i put in my kdeglobals : > >[KDE URL Restrictions][$i] >rule_12=list,,,,http,,,false >rule_13=open,,,,http,,,false > > >These lines are for forbidden http / https in konqueror. > >How i can do ??? > >Thanks for your help. This type of question probably is more appropriate for the users mail list, but look at tdelibs/tdecore/README.kiosk: http://git.trinitydesktop.org/cgit/tdelibs/tree/tdecore/README.kiosk The purpose of those rules and the kiosk framework is to restrict user access to various components. The reason you can't open the desktop link is one of the restriction rules is preventing that from happening. Figure out which specific rule is doing that. :) Darrell

11 years, 7 months

Problem with URL links

by Jean Milot

Hello, I have set Iceweasel to open URL link. If i create a link on my desktop (right clic), i can't open it if i put in my kdeglobals : [KDE URL Restrictions][$i] rule_12=list,,,,http,,,false rule_13=open,,,,http,,,false These lines are for forbidden http / https in konqueror. How i can do ??? Thanks for your help. Sincerely, Jean

11 years, 7 months

FW:

by jamesg＠dimensionality.com

http://www.zaszlokeszites.com/gjilq0.php

11 years, 7 months

Re: [trinity-devel] Name of distribution in the version number of Debian and Ubuntu packages

by Darrell Anderson

>What do the other developers on this list think of the >current state of GIT in relation to a possible release? Regressions (14): http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd =Regressions Blocker (12): http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd =Blocker Critical (24): http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd =Critical Patches Available (30): http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=PATCHAVAIL&que ry_format=advanced&order=bug_severity%2Cbug_id%20DESC&query_based_on =PatchesAvail Build Issues (79): http://bugs.trinitydesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd =Build%20issues Darrell

11 years, 7 months

Name of distribution in the version number of Debian and Ubuntu packages

by Slávek Banko

Hello, I noticed two problems with the name of distribution and its location in the version number of packages. 1) We can soon expect: Names of distributions are not ascending. After Wheezy will follow Jessie => packages with ~jessie in the name will be considered older than ~wheezy (and also ~squeeze). 2) It is a real problem already now: Before the name of the distribution is in the version of package 'packaging-release' number by tde-packaging. After split folder for new distribution this number is *always lower* than the previous distribution. This now makes it impossible to do dist-upgrade for many distributions. My suggestions are: 1) Use the version number of the distribution instead of the name. 2) Move the distribution version number before other numbers. For example, from: 14.0.0-0debian12+r789+pr42~wheezy Change version to: 14.0.0-0debian12.7.0+r789+pr42 And in the future (to allow switch format from native to quilt): 14.0.0~r789-0debian12.7.0+pr42 Note: I noticed that the same use version number of distribution can be found even in the standard ubuntu packages - such as firefox. Slavek --

11 years, 7 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels April 2013