On
Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> > Hello all, Tim,
> >> >
> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth
update
> was
>
> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they be
> >>
> >> treated?
> >>
> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as
conflicting
> /
>
> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
> >>
> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release
back
> yet
>
> >> again. My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we
>
> blocked
>
> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package
field.
> >> At first glance the files listed are
not used by the majority of
TDE
> >> applications, so renaming them might
not be as bad as it first
looks.
> >> Let
> >> me see what I can do with it.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >
> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before
>
> release
>
> > RC1.
> > Should I help?
> >
> > Slavek
>
> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of
these
> issues. I don't know if the TDE sources
will need to be updated
> anywhere
> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tim
I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I
did
not
find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
Slavek
So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?
Tim
Most of the conflicts were resolved, but still remain conflicts
qt3-apps-dev × tqt3-apps-dev:
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.prl
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.prl
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.prl