15 Aug
2013
15 Aug
'13
7:15 p.m.
Here is
propoused patch which checks if demangle.h is present.
Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
it. 
15 Aug
15 Aug
9:02 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
2013/8/16 Darrell Anderson <darrella(a)hushmail.com>
Actually anybody can test --- just temporarily rename or move
/usr/include/demangle.h. :-)
The previous patch makes turning on the debug quite tricky, so better to
remove the ifdef's with NDEBUG in backtrace_symbols.c.
I've tested the build both with and without demangle.h and seems everything
is ok. so retest
Here is propoused patch which checks if demangle.h is
present.
Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
it. 
16 Aug
16 Aug
7:18 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
Dne pá 16. srpna 2013 Fat-Zer napsal(a):
2013/8/16 Darrell Anderson
<darrella(a)hushmail.com>
Actually anybody can test --- just temporarily rename or move
/usr/include/demangle.h. :-)
The previous patch makes turning on the debug quite tricky, so better
to remove the ifdef's with NDEBUG in backtrace_symbols.c.
I've tested the build both with and without demangle.h and seems
everything is ok. so retest
It was necessary to add a condition for linking with BFD.
Updated patch attached. Please test it.
Slavek
--
Here is propoused patch which checks if demangle.h is
present.
Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
it.
11:15 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
2013/8/16 Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz>
Dne pá 16. srpna 2013 Fat-Zer napsal(a):
Sorry, I'm a little confused, so, slackware doesn't have libbfq at all or
just demangle.h is missing?
If the matter is about linking than IMHO the solution with conditional
user-defined option is better.
Anyway in a day or two I'll came with a normal patch to move all that to
kdebug.cpp and provide WITH_LIBBFD for optional linkage... + some
additional backtrace features.
2013/8/16 Darrell Anderson
<darrella(a)hushmail.com>
The previous patch makes turning on the debug quite tricky, so better
to remove the ifdef's with NDEBUG in backtrace_symbols.c.
I've tested the build both with and without demangle.h and seems
everything is ok. so retest
It was necessary to add a condition for linking with BFD.
Updated patch attached. Please test it.
Slavek
--
> Here
is propoused patch which checks if demangle.h is present.
Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
it.
Actually anybody can test --- just temporarily rename or move
/usr/include/demangle.h. :-)
4:31 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
On Friday 16 of August 2013 20:15:31 Fat-Zer wrote:
2013/8/16 Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz>
When there is no demangle.h => not used full backtrace => is unnecessary
linking libbfd. On Debian / Ubuntu is demangle.h along with libbfd.so
contained in the package binutils-dev. If binutils-dev is not installed,
demangle.h is not present and also not be linking to libbfd. Therefore, this
condition is necessary.
Add WITH_LIBBFD choice is in my opinion nonsense. In this case, it makes more
sense to me to add choice WITH_TDEIOSLAVE_BACKTRACE or generally
WITH_BACKTRACE_HANDLER.
Therefore I propose to use either:
1) automatic enabling backtrace handler by HAVE_BACKTRACE and HAVE_DEMANGLE_H
=> patch from http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::11361
2) add choise WITH_TDEIOSLAVE_BACKTRACE (or WITH_BACKTRACE_HANDLER) to enable
backtrace handler => patch from
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::11354
Because, unlike WITH_KDESKTOP_LOCK_BACKTRACE, in this case it was a temporary
solution for debugging, I personally prefer the first option.
What is your opinion?
Slavek
Dne pá 16. srpna 2013 Fat-Zer napsal(a):
Sorry, I'm a little confused, so, slackware doesn't have libbfq at all or
just demangle.h is missing?
If the matter is about linking than IMHO the solution with conditional
user-defined option is better.
Anyway in a day or two I'll came with a normal patch to move all that to
kdebug.cpp and provide WITH_LIBBFD for optional linkage... + some
additional backtrace features. 2013/8/16 Darrell Anderson
<darrella(a)hushmail.com>
It was necessary to add a condition for linking with BFD.
Updated patch attached. Please test it.
Slavek
-- >> Here is propoused patch which checks if
demangle.h is present.
>
>Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
>it.
Actually anybody can test --- just temporarily rename or move
/usr/include/demangle.h. :-)
The previous patch makes turning on the debug quite tricky, so better
to remove the ifdef's with NDEBUG in backtrace_symbols.c.
I've tested the build both with and without demangle.h and seems
everything is ok. so retest
17 Aug
17 Aug
4:41 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
On Saturday 17 of August 2013 01:31:47 Slávek Banko wrote:
On Friday 16 of August 2013 20:15:31 Fat-Zer wrote:
I decided as follows: Now I push a patch from option 1, to resolve acute
FTBFS. The advantage is that there is no need for additional build option
that should be changed prospectively. And integration with the kdebug, which
is a good idea, it can be done later.
Slavek
2013/8/16 Slávek Banko
<slavek.banko(a)axis.cz>
When there is no demangle.h => not used full backtrace => is unnecessary
linking libbfd. On Debian / Ubuntu is demangle.h along with libbfd.so
contained in the package binutils-dev. If binutils-dev is not installed,
demangle.h is not present and also not be linking to libbfd. Therefore,
this condition is necessary.
Add WITH_LIBBFD choice is in my opinion nonsense. In this case, it makes
more sense to me to add choice WITH_TDEIOSLAVE_BACKTRACE or generally
WITH_BACKTRACE_HANDLER.
Therefore I propose to use either:
1) automatic enabling backtrace handler by HAVE_BACKTRACE and
HAVE_DEMANGLE_H => patch from
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::11361
2) add choise WITH_TDEIOSLAVE_BACKTRACE (or WITH_BACKTRACE_HANDLER) to
enable backtrace handler => patch from
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::11354
Because, unlike WITH_KDESKTOP_LOCK_BACKTRACE, in this case it was a
temporary solution for debugging, I personally prefer the first option.
What is your opinion?
Slavek
Dne pá 16. srpna 2013 Fat-Zer napsal(a):
Sorry, I'm a little confused, so, slackware doesn't have libbfq at all or
just demangle.h is missing?
If the matter is about linking than IMHO the solution with conditional
user-defined option is better.
Anyway in a day or two I'll came with a normal patch to move all that to
kdebug.cpp and provide WITH_LIBBFD for optional linkage... + some
additional backtrace features. 2013/8/16 Darrell Anderson
<darrella(a)hushmail.com>
> >> Here is propoused patch which checks if demangle.h is present.
> >
> >Darrell, I have demangle.h on my system, so it's up to you to test
> >it.
>
> Actually anybody can test --- just temporarily rename or move
> /usr/include/demangle.h. :-)
The previous patch makes turning on the debug quite tricky, so better
to remove the ifdef's with NDEBUG in backtrace_symbols.c.
I've tested the build both with and without demangle.h and seems
everything is ok. so retest
It was necessary to add a condition for linking with BFD.
Updated patch attached. Please test it.
Slavek
--
8:38 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
2013/8/17 Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz>
I decided as follows: Now I push a patch from option
1, to resolve acute
FTBFS. The advantage is that there is no need for additional build option
that should be changed prospectively. And integration with the kdebug,
which
is a good idea, it can be done later.
Slavek
yes, sure, go ahead... I'll provide my work as I finish.
FIO: There is an another FTBFS with recent binutils e.g. 2.23.1.
See upstream bug 14243: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243
8:43 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] tdelibs FTBFS
2013/8/17 Fat-Zer <fatzer2(a)gmail.com>
2013/8/17 Slávek Banko <slavek.banko(a)axis.cz>
*I meant FYI, sorry.
I decided as follows: Now I push a patch from
option 1, to resolve acute
FTBFS. The advantage is that there is no need for additional build option
that should be changed prospectively. And integration with the kdebug,
which
is a good idea, it can be done later.
Slavek
yes, sure, go ahead... I'll provide my work as I finish.
FIO: There is an another FTBFS with recent binutils e.g. 2.23.1.
See upstream bug 14243:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243
3928
days inactive
3929
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Darrell Anderson -
Fat-Zer -
Slávek Banko