tde-users

users@trinitydesktop.org

22 participants
4374 discussions

HELP : main panel lost !!!
by daniele.manghi＠libero.it 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Hi, here is my problem :I had a Trinity perfectly working on oneiric,This afternoon I decided it was time to upgrade the whole oneiric, including the KDE 4,and since then there is no more main panel bar, or whatever you call it :no more menus, except for the desktop's one, no more notifications, not state icons, etc., only the naked desktop with application icons on it and nothing else. Does someone know of a way for me to recover from this state ?Daniele

3 2

KWallet
by leee 28 Oct '12

28 Oct '12

Hello folks, Can anyone tell me how to remove or disable KWallet? I recently added a couple of new very low traffic e-mail to accounts to check and I want to store their passwords. However, I don't want to use KWallet and instead I just store them in the kmail config file. The problem is that now, every time I close Kmail I get a prompt to set up KWallet and when I decline to use it I'm then prompted to save the passwords again. If I simply close the KWallet prompt I lose the saved passwords and then have to look them up and re-enter them each time I check the accounts. This is really annoying. So, is there some way of removing KWallet entirely or at least disabling it? TIA LeeE

7 21

Trinity 3.5.13-sru for Ubuntu 12.10 - Quantal Quetzal
by Slávek Banko 27 Oct '12

27 Oct '12

Hi all, It's been a few days, when it was officially released a new version of Ubuntu - Quantal Quetzal. Although I have not yet seen questions on the availability of Trinity for this new version, I would like to inform you that are available for testing basic packages Trinity stable branch - 3.5.13-sru: https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/~slavek-banko/+archive/axis/+packag… Are available so far only basic packages - application packages will be added subsequently. I note that I do not have a test machine with Quantal, so you'll be the first one to test the packages in practice. Slavek --

1 0

kdevelop dependecy problem on debian
by Mag. Dr. Nikolaus Klepp 26 Oct '12

26 Oct '12

I just tried to get starting with kdevelop. Somehow I cannot get the development files installed: # apt-get install libqt3-mt-dev libqt3-mt Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done libqt3-mt is already the newest version. libqt3-mt set to manually installed. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libqt3-mt-dev : Depends: libqt3-mt (= 3:3.3.8d-1ubuntu0+ax1~squeeze) but 3:3.3.8-d-0ubuntu0+sr73+pr181~squeeze is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Any idea how to correct that? Nik

8 9

Problems with key
by Gregor Burck 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Hi, I try to add the kex like you write: apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net --recv-keys 2B8638D0 But the server doesn't answer: Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /tmp/tmp.EYtoNu4iT2 --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net --recv-keys 2B8638D0 gpg: Schlüssel 2B8638D0 von hkp-Server keyserver.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net anfordern ?: keyserver.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net: Connection timed out gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Connection timed out gpg: Keine gültigen OpenPGP-Daten gefunden. gpg: Anzahl insgesamt bearbeiteter Schlüssel: 0 Bye Gregor --

3 3

Re: [trinity-users] Unsubscribe threat
by Robert Xu 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:03 AM, <trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> wrote: > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net mailing list. [snip] > --8701F456024E.1348439718/vali.starlink.edu > Content-Description: Delivery report > Content-Type: message/delivery-status > > Reporting-MTA: dns; vali.starlink.edu > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 8701F456024E > X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; trinity-users-return-3629-robxu9=gmail.com(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net > Arrival-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:35:17 -0500 (CDT) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; robxu9(a)gmail.com > Original-Recipient: rfc822;robxu9(a)gmail.com > Action: failed > Status: 5.7.1 > Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Unauthenticated email is not accepted from > this domain. k2si7073925igo.55 > [snip] > Subject: Re: [trinity-users] Unsubscribe threat > > What is beginning to happen around the net -- with 'responsible' ISPs -- > is the enforcement of Forward-confirmed reverse DNS (FCrDNS) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-confirmed_reverse_DNS > -and- > > Sender Policy Framework (SPF) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework > > In a nutshell, lists email distribution is affected because the emails > are re-sent by the list server as From: The_Originator(a)example.com. > Which is true -- it did originate "From:" me, or "From:" you. > But, it appears to be a forgery to incoming mailservers that do this > checking, because those emails CANNOT be "From:" that user from THAT MTA. > > For example, this email - From: Jonesy <trinity(a)jonz.net> cannot > be sent from the mail servers at vali.starlink.edu --- at least not > with FCrDNS checking. > > FCrDNS cuts down on A LOT of spam. My SysAdmin says 90% of incoming > email is pure crap spam -- with forged "From:"s out of cracked botnet > machines. FCrDNS cuts down on ALMOST ALL of that. > Think of the savings... > > But, I've had to remove my domain from that checking by my ISP because > I am on so many lists, email reflectors, what-ever-you-call-them. > Eventually lists will have to evolve to some different scheme. Huh? So you are intentionally having emails bounce? > > Too much information? > Jonesy > brb; head hurts ;P -- later daze. :: Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu

7 17

The module User Management could not be loaded
by Uwe Brauer 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

Hello I just wanted to change some setting of the users of the system. But when I try to access the user management via the KDE control center I obtain the following error message: (Using Kubuntu 10.04 and the latest trinity package) ,---- | | The module User Management could not be loaded. | Possible reasons: | * An error occurred during your last kde upgrade leaving an orphaned control module | * You have old third party modules lying around | | Check these points carefully and try to remove the module mentioned | in the error message. If this fails, consider contacting your distributor | or packager. `---- Which package is missing? Thanks Uwe Brauer

1 0

Debian Wheezy builds?
by d33 tah 21 Oct '12

21 Oct '12

Hi guys, Is there any chance you would prepare TDE packages for Debian Wheezy (testing)? I recently changed the release because the packages I used on Debian stable were outdated and I really miss Trinity Desktop. Yours, d33tah

2 1

Minor problems
by westbound＠gmx.net 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Hi, I have been using Ubuntu 12.04 with xfce/xubuntu as long as there was no trinity repository available. Now that I have updated to the trinity desktop, there seem to be some problems that I can't figure out. Firstly, I want single-click activation on the desktop and in the file manager, but can't find the place where to configure this. Then, I am missing the Sleep and Hibernate buttons on logout. Both of the mentioned items have been working ok on my previous setup with kubuntu-trinity 10.10. Anybody have some hints how to rectify this? Thanks, Mike

2 2

Re: [trinity-users] Problem with new Qt3 Widget in KDevelop
by John A. Sullivan III 19 Oct '12

19 Oct '12

On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 11:23 +0000, trinity-users-digest-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net wrote: > This might be a KDevelop bug; TQDIALOG_OBJECT_NAME_STRING was > not replaced > at compile-time as it probably should have been. However, > this brings up > an interesting point; a native Qt3 application will not be > compatible with > TQt3, which TDE will use as of R14.0, without replacement of > the various > Q* objects with TQ* objects. > > Tim > OUCH! I recognize that we are far behind the curve on migrating Qt4 but we do not have the resources migrate this important application at this time. But this seems a bit strange. Doesn't that violate the whole idea of Qt being cross platform? What if I want to run my old Qt3 application on a platform that does not have TDE installed? Thanks - John

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

tde-users