tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

2 participants
3849 discussions

wrong path when uninstalling trinity on Ubuntu 14.04
by Ondrej Riha 24 Jan '15

24 Jan '15

When uninstalling on Ubuntu 14.04 there are some errors: Removing konsole-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/konsole-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/konsole-tr= inity.prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package konsole-trinity (--purge): podproces nain=B9talovan=FD skript pre-removal vr=E1til chybov=FD k=F3d 12= 7 Removing ksmserver-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ksmserver-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ksmserve= r-trinity.prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package ksmserver-trinity (--purge): podproces nain=B9talovan=FD skript pre-removal vr=E1til chybov=FD k=F3d 12= 7 Removing twin-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/twin-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/twin-trinity.= prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package twin-trinity (--purge): podproces installed script pre-removal returned error code 127 There are some errors during uninstall: konsole-trinity ksmserver-trinity twin-trinity There may be some other errors. update-alternatives is in /usr/bin and not in /usr/sbin $ whereis update-alternatives update-alternatives: /usr/bin/update-alternatives /usr/bin/X11/update-alter= natives /usr/share/man/man8/update-alternatives.8.gz Thanks. OR

1 0

Protocol section empty in the Help system
by Michele Calgaro 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 If I open the Help system and look inside the "Protocol" section, I see just a message "Information about the available protocols". I remember that some months ago there used to be a list of the available protocols in the system. I see the same problem both on my system (Jessie, local TDE build) and in a VM machine (Wheezy, official R14.0.0). Is anyone else seeing this? If so I will open a proper bug report. Thanks Michele -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUv1dJAAoJECp1t8qK3tXPTUUQAKs3mtdOuhPf3w6k0x0wxbL/ EPRK8sT17k10vRY8ePIudcMwUZTfxIGHg0GXWORHHybgJfUKUf1K54ATQU2o8Oao 5Y6pwndmd6i2D6m+2VmI4Z95Gokozrx2tylrAzFKFKTI+STyOu3Qbcwg9nlU6EoB B4raV5oRKqx/e9FG2E7MUobXvuF7U2ZXYYXsNVYVeFn8ykbJD8mxNP5jUaFHDIYN zJxC0mtLzd+j7I4dX/CDdqFGdWnXrITOdhh31PnMFhdBnYdC3eeUB/r4Wy77yIF5 GXDBgBZ+S+3Y2Fwla2RrNiCVEEGCVkzUT+uYh/pkwRFTDxoCA02xYDZ87zh+8hXF 0TrmWR6dldl3JU1HFKMPh8bnehwxWN+CgZ0DDGPdc1iy1I+4E/AwDso4+GvAEEn3 g2Kmxe/uy7rVkNtZ+ZkAqT934QFqGhqlsBDQ6UeHtyUuO5H4t2h0Nyy5dWxG1iOm VbGtNmxWWVimZTz848ivfkDwnOlMDu8sBHIoC5R2if/Wk51dawcpCczTtyBG3Pkc +hWs0nAmSBlEymmDfJW8dj4E49WFIK41e0by9VK4t05Zv8A/b+iqDPKPNkQAoBeZ LWe4TnTfhPvdA04i/G7Rsg3DEpiUgJ62nlsfFK7r8kOXOfKuGED20mMmsA1psdX8 JmSozCD3m4xZur59BhBd =78Kj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 4

Codebase formatting discussion
by Timothy Pearson 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 All, This is a follow-up on point #5 from my post earlier this month entitled "TDE GIT thaw, build farm status, and future direction". > Codebase formatting. While this is not a major problem for the users > I have been tripped up more than once by the fact that some portions of > the codebase (twin among others) use a vastly different style of > indentation and bracing, one that is (IMHO) extremely hard to read and/or > modify. This in turn has therefore contributed to many "fix up prior > commit" commits and/or outright regressions in GIT. I greatly prefer > Stroustrup style formatting with hard tab indentation (no space or > combined space/tab indents) and indented public/protected/private blocks. > This style is highly legible, emphasizes the control flow, and produces a > minimal number of non-whitespace difference lines when an if/else block is > modified. All of the new code (thousands and thousands of lines of it) > that I have contributed to TDE have been in this style. I have been > toying with reformatting the entire TDE codebase in one large commit; if > there are no objections I think this step could greatly improve both our > development speed and the overall quality of the codebase; comments and > discussion are welcome. I would like to start converting over the codebase ASAP. I have an automated tool that will do this, but would like some feedback on the style to convert into as reformatting like this is a one-time operation that will not be repeated for the life of the TDE project. As mentioned above I strongly prefer a modified Stroustrup style formatting. Is this acceptable to the other developers, and if not, what would you rather use and why? Thanks! Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSjHncACgkQLaxZSoRZrGF0owDcDGlmwDw7tQ/jTZc+RPsh9Un8 J/p7Qopfm0FmKADdFWqOHlrmHs6p9sl/aPtWa5F3/Zw2JyoE7G6t1A== =/kGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 37

Removal of tde-packaging branch 'suse'
by Slávek Banko 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

Hi all, I propose to remove the branch 'suse' of tde-packaging. This branch is unused / unmaintained and is generally incorrect. For each distribution is intended folder, not a branch. Exactly as are maintained packages for OpenSUSE by François. Therefore I consider branch 'suse' suitable for disposal. Any objections? -- Slávek

3 2

git pretty format
by Darrell 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

I lost git pretty format. Now all I see is a bunch of ESC[m characters. I haven't knowingly changed anything at my end so what happened to the formatting with the Trinity repo? Darrell

2 2

Recent outage
by Timothy Pearson 08 Jan '15

08 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 All, As you are probably already aware at around 13:20 GMT 01/07/2015 all TDE services went offline. This was due to a widespread power outage; to make matters worse the site's backup generator froze and did not start in time due to the extreme cold in the area. All services should now be restored, however as this was a full outage I expect that there may be some remaining issues that I am not yet aware of. Please let me know if you see anything still down or malfunctioning at this point. As always we need your support to stay online! If you can, please help the project stay online: https://trinitydesktop.org/donate.php Thank you for your patience! Timothy Pearson Trinity Desktop Project -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSuq0YACgkQLaxZSoRZrGFVHwDfTXwqQA89GXJmB7Df6CpbCnzG XuB0T8ndFjEwwQDeLOMlNJw2YLJxbR7H3UT+yIKuiv+xcRKM018d9g== =LF7k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Temporary outage
by Timothy Pearson 05 Jan '15

05 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 All, Maintainance was unexpectedly required on the server supporting the TDE Web services; I am working on the issue and this outage should be resolved in the next day or two (e.g. sometime around 01/03/2015 GMT). My apologies for any inconvenience this may cause! Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSnC1QACgkQLaxZSoRZrGHP2ADePKpBE1E+/bKY0visvWheKUny DIaj4oRT3Q7Z1QDgxuM8ipaZohfqAMkqx//qSwC4WMWq4WnkOl4M1Q== =l2JU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 7

List archive
by Timothy Pearson 04 Jan '15

04 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 All, It has recently come to my attention that the list archive for the trinity-devel mailing list is not updating its index pages correctly. Thus far, only the trinity-devel list is affected; all list data has been archived and is searchable but the index pages are not being generated past the middle of December 2014. I will be working on this issue in the future; looks like ezmlm-www is due for an upgrade. Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSmQTIACgkQLaxZSoRZrGFx4wDfXSqONtpreYMH6EYMYGLBDPb/ zYLr+kjE/1fuZgDcCiIGuSIUZ3P9YFtLRgWWPoMUy4zmoTDP1mUOkw== =nuM7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

Tde R14.0.0 packages for PCLinuxOS
by Alexandre 03 Jan '15

03 Jan '15

Hi, I would like to evaluate the possibility of using TDE R14.0.0 on my PCLinuxOS TDE remaster. Are the PCLInuxOS TDE packages ready? I would also like if it is possible to still keep the 3.5.13.2 packages until the next TDE release, since they are ultra stable. Thank you for your hard work on TDE! -Alexandre

4 10

Package renames and autoremove
by Mike Bird 02 Jan '15

02 Jan '15

The upgrade from 3.5.13.2 to R14 includes a lot of package "renames". After a clean i386 Wheezy 3.5.13.2 install of kde-trinity is upgraded to R14 RC2, an "apt-get autoremove" removes 48 transitional dummy packages. This is good. However there are still (roughly) 15 transitional dummy packages whose descriptions say they can be safely uninstalled. All that is preventing them from being uninstalled is two meta packages - kde-trinity and kde-core-trinity. And so the conscientious sysadmin removes the two unnecessary meta packages and the (roughly) 15 remaining transitional dummy packages. And the next "apt-get autoremove" eats 290 packages which is most of Trinity. If you had less than a normal kde-trinity installation of 3.5.13.2 this problem hits you much sooner and without uninstalling any meta packages. What to do? Something in the release notes? --Mike

4 34

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels