tde-users

users@trinitydesktop.org

9 participants
4393 discussions

changing default kmail browser
by dep 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

greetings, one and all . . . there is a setting someplace that i cannot find, and it is making me crazy. well, crazier. everywhere i can, i have set firefox as my default browser. but kmail won't listen. no matter what i do, when i click on a link in an email message, here comes konqueror, which is a great file manager and a terrible web browser. i very much hope that this behavior is not hardcoded. have set firefox as the default in the kde system settings through kcontrol (and the other places, such as konqueror configuration, where the same choice appears) and it seems to have taken -- everyplace except kmail, which is where it chiefly matters. anyone know where i can change this? thanks. -- dep The shortest distance between you and great fingerstyle guitar playing? The new instructional DVDs from Marjorie Thompson, available now at www.MarjorieThompson.com

3 6

Imagemagick error
by Paul Cartwright 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

I just tried to open Imagemagick in trinity and nothing happened. So I edited the menu, found the executable and ran it in a terminal. This is what it came back with: :~$ display.im6 display.im6: color is not known to server `FOREGROUND': No such file or directory @ error/xwindow.c/XGetPixelPacket/3064. I switched to Mate desktop and Imagemagick ran as normal.. So it is a trinity issue.. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587

1 0

konquerorsu. Cannot write to files with kate, kwrite
by Nigel Henry 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Binary install of 3.5.13.2 on Xubuntu Lucid 10.04 I'm having a problem writing to files with konquerorsu. It is started with (kdesudo -c 'konqueror --profile filemanagement') then requests password, then opens ok. I can create directories ok in the filesystem so it's obviously running as root, but I cannot save edited files, with kate, kwrite, and xfce's mousepad complaining about a permissions issue. I have no problems with konquerorsu on other distros by the way. I also started xfce's thunar from a shell with sudo thunar (on the TDE), and can save to files ok with that, so it's not some global problem about saving to files. Any suggestions as to how to resolve the problem? Thanks. Nigel.

1 1

Behaviour setting on configure desktop
by Lisi Reisz 19 Nov '13

19 Nov '13

There is a problem (bug) with the settings for icons, in that I cannot set them. On my own computer they simply don't display, no matter how many settings I tick in the behaviour setting. I rarely use icons so this is a very minor problem. But I am setting up an installation for a client who relies on icons. He will be most upset to have the wrong ones. I go through ticking and unticking the boxes for the various hardware and files, click on "apply", and nothing changes, except that all the settings return to the default. The icons I want to get rid of remain and the ones that I want to show remain stubbornly invisible. Has anyone any suggestions for what I can do about this? Lisi

4 8

Help - Live Disk Problem
by David Bell 18 Nov '13

18 Nov '13

Greetings, Having installed TDE successfully on my desktop, using tde-3.5.13.2-ubuntu-12.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso, I have struck a problem with my laptop. Although I have previously installed many other GNU/Linux distros on it the live disk installs happily but won't install to the hdd. The disk was written on the laptop. When I select either the install icon or the item in the menu the CDROM comes to life then stops. A puzzlement! Is there is a command line I could use? Can anyone help me finally escape KDE4 using the live disk please? David W. Devon

1 0

Concerns about TDE R14 and 3.5.13.2 SRU
by Alexandre Couture 18 Nov '13

18 Nov '13

Hi everyone, I have a few concerns about TDE R14 and 3.5.13.2 SRU It seems to me that 3.5.13.2 SRU has next to perfect stability, features and reliability, while R14 is not there yet. By looking at this page: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/patches/ , almost all I can see is that the dev team is working very hard to just keep R14 in working conditions. Sometimes Amarok doesn't start, sometimes desktop or menus are unresponsive for a moment, some themes doesn't work completely and it is not like if the user would benefit from a new set of feature or a complete visual overhaul. I cannot see why an user would benefit from using the upcoming R14 when it is compared to the stability of 3.5.13.2 SRU. Everything works as it should in 3.5.13.2. It wolud have been a very good ground for improving TDE on top of it. All of this trouble is supposed to be for the integrations of QT4 parts in TDE, but it seems to me that in R14, it will be used nowhere, not even for a single check-box in a config panel. Maybe it is just me, maybe I would need some explanations. I mean that if the efforts has been made to make TDE more attractive to new users and to modernize it, it would certainly have more popularity. As well as making a new ''outside'' on top of an outdated car is not good, changing everything under the hood and keeping the old outdated ''outside'' is certainly not better at all. I know that TDE could be better, if some attention could be thrown at things that are not just under the hood. Just one man's opinion... Tell us what you think! -Alexandre

19 30

Re: [trinity-users] "Improving"/"Modernizing" the Look of TDE Considered Harmful
by William Morder 17 Nov '13

17 Nov '13

Anybody who wants TDE to look more "modern" (like Windoze, iPutz or whatnot), I say -- LET THEM EAT CAKE! The charm of the KDE3 desktop is its simplicity. Keep it simple, and let users configure it themselves. Bill

1 0

Re: confirm unsubscribe from trinity-users@lists.pearsoncomputing.net
by Burlen Loring 14 Nov '13

14 Nov '13

On 11/14/2013 10:21 AM, trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net wrote: > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > trinity-users(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net mailing list. > > I'm working for my owner, who can be reached > at trinity-users-owner(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net. > > > I haven't checked whether your address is currently on the mailing list. > To see what address you used to subscribe, look at the messages you are > receiving from the mailing list. Each message has your address hidden > inside its return path; for example, mary(a)example.com receives > messages with return path: > <trinity-users-return-<number>-mary=example.com(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net. > > Some mail programs are broken and cannot handle long addresses. If you > cannot reply to this request, instead send a message to > <trinity-users-request(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> and put the entire address listed above > into the "Subject:" line. > > or for the digest to: > <trinity-users-digest-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> > > For addition or removal of addresses, I'll send a confirmation > message to that address. When you receive it, simply reply to it > to complete the transaction. > > If you need to get in touch with the human owner of this list, > please send a message to: > > <trinity-users-owner(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> > > Please include a FORWARDED list message with ALL HEADERS intact > to make it easier to help you. > > --- Enclosed is a copy of the request I received. > > Return-Path: <bloring(a)lbl.gov> > Received: (qmail 4838 invoked by uid 64014); 14 Nov 2013 12:21:19 -0600 > Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) > by mail.pearsoncomputing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ABC45601F3 > for <trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:21:19 -0600 (CST) > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pearsoncomputing.net > X-Spam-Flag: NO > X-Spam-Score: -0.091 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.091 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 > tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, EMPTY_MESSAGE=2.32, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.799, > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no > Received: from mail.pearsoncomputing.net ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (vali.starlink.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with ESMTP id TC85ERtSDQUX > for <trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>; > Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:21:13 -0600 (CST) > Received: from fe2.lbl.gov (fe2.lbl.gov [128.3.41.134]) > by mail.pearsoncomputing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FC745601C9 > for <trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:21:13 -0600 (CST) > X-Ironport-SBRS: 4.8 > X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true > X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUKAHUThVLRVcC2lGdsb2JhbABag3SFSbMqhmt6Fg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgmQVKz0WGAMCAQIBIgEFAQIOBgICFQgBAYd9BZ55gwSRJY0rj3yEGwOJQp5uQYR0 > X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,700,1378882800"; > d="scan'208";a="34940089" > Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]) > by fe2.lbl.gov with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2013 10:21:13 -0800 > Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y13so2345500pdi.27 > for <trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:12 -0800 (PST) > X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=1e100.net; s=20130820; > h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to > :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; > bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; > b=aCThfeSBkvkYAjEH/315854jZtRhcxrlRcitW2dvTzCc4giN4SYxaC/y/KMF9IWa0s > 6bZfsjKzdRQZ59RKcWQio3YAfqKc9uF3nYRh7bUasKMxgwR7BsJavbU0fHrPi0beKNAe > 7Euo4wBBxNaiT3HmIoxXshN35SHDYcsWvQAIT5c00g3hxwWTFPrR26WTFOpyyqzpIxhF > HsDeezfsFuqp6Nunes7/QxMmxDDRiSrEdkDpaGXHS34WRC99UhVDk2RuvbgSqZngAX+I > jhy5yM1/179PtmXZ5+PDCCSvpcbp4gC0pbySDzLBUfkU97896g9Z5R1RGR5BLePyGqMJ > aCkw== > X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmgA8j1oliZnInnUOwLecKyH0k2wVX4BVwkLasypOf4TcPUtGNbyw8yIJSs/KleOnRcqXpNvGUZYVJMzSc16vLg3IxPThMt3xtWfwthFYkAKxxnxTr/0n3Uc4ZGMcbolP3vfbCcOztwEDaIOKspvdroVWJmsL0zDBVR+TGzaNQK2+QGq4MVRU6HlGUhYmdHILn5TPN03+g2RadY84chA44EEGsxLuz3TYcVyEfz6pFnmhTYQHaRet/g66DQU17UNLoySzuxlJhlKLT0XzpfHw/lpxn/tA== > X-Received: by 10.66.231.6 with SMTP id tc6mr2767919pac.68.1384453272857; > Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:12 -0800 (PST) > X-Received: by 10.66.231.6 with SMTP id tc6mr2767890pac.68.1384453272454; > Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:12 -0800 (PST) > Received: from rocky.dhcp (rocky.dhcp.lbl.gov. [131.243.240.205]) > by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uf2sm8373516pbc.28.2013.11.14.10.21.11 > for <trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> > (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); > Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:11 -0800 (PST) > Message-ID: <52851496.9030700(a)lbl.gov> > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:21:10 -0800 > From: Burlen Loring <bloring(a)lbl.gov> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: trinity-users-unsubscribe-bloring=lbl.gov(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >

1 0

Re: [trinity-users] Errors while compiling tdebase
by Vince Reher 14 Nov '13

14 Nov '13

On Tuesday 12 November 2013, Timothy Pearson wrote: > > I have been trying to compile Trinity from source on a relatively current > > Gentoo system and am running into the following errors: > > > > In file included from > > /offline/1-1/TDE/main/tdebase/kcontrol/tdm/main.cpp:342:0: > > /offline/1-1/TDE/BUILD/tdebase-3.5.13/kcontrol/background/main.moc: > > In member function âvirtual void* KBackground::tqt_cast(const char*)â: > > /offline/1-1/TDE/BUILD/tdebase-3.5.13/kcontrol/background/main.moc:81:41: > > error: cannot call member function âvirtual void* > > TDECModule::qt_cast(const char*)â without object > > > > and similar errors for tqt_invoke, tqt_emit, and tqt_property. > > > > I tried GCC versions 4.7.3, 4.6.3, 4.5.3 and experience the same error. > > It also occurs regardless of whether I am compiling with current git > > sources or the Trinity release 3.5.13.2 tarballs I found at > > http://depot-trinity.dotriver.eu/releases/3.5.13.2. > > > > Anybody else experience this? I tried playing around with the source code > > (not really knowing what I am doing) to get beyond the error but that just > > got me linker errors instead. Building TDE had been going pretty smoothly > > until this. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > trinity-users-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > trinity-users-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net > > Read list messages on the web archive: > > http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ > > Please remember not to top-post: > > http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting > > Do you have any version of Qt3 and/or TQt3 other than TQt3 from GIT > installed on your system? > > Tim > > Tim, I am sure that there was no vestige of a former Qt3 and/or TQt3, at least on some of the systems I tried building in, but your question suggested further investigations about whether I had a truly 'clean room' build environment. I edited the cmake & autoconf shell scripts I was using to build in order to remove influential environment variables and configuration options that were not explicitly called for in your build instructions. After doing so, I was able to get past the compiler error, at least for stock 3.5.13.2. I'll try again tomorrow with the current git sources. Although there was nothing obviously wrong with my original scripts (designed on the fly to fix build problems from several years ago), I now believe that these somehow bypassed the tqtinterface to tqt3. The main suspects are the setting of the C*_INCLUDE_PATH environment variables and / or passing an improper explicit -DMOC_EXECUTABLE parameter to the cmake configure script. Thanks for your suggestion, I'm back in operation. Vince

1 0

Errors while compiling tdebase
by Vince Reher 13 Nov '13

13 Nov '13

I have been trying to compile Trinity from source on a relatively current Gentoo system and am running into the following errors: In file included from /offline/1-1/TDE/main/tdebase/kcontrol/tdm/main.cpp:342:0: /offline/1-1/TDE/BUILD/tdebase-3.5.13/kcontrol/background/main.moc: In member function ‘virtual void* KBackground::tqt_cast(const char*)’: /offline/1-1/TDE/BUILD/tdebase-3.5.13/kcontrol/background/main.moc:81:41: error: cannot call member function ‘virtual void* TDECModule::qt_cast(const char*)’ without object and similar errors for tqt_invoke, tqt_emit, and tqt_property. I tried GCC versions 4.7.3, 4.6.3, 4.5.3 and experience the same error. It also occurs regardless of whether I am compiling with current git sources or the Trinity release 3.5.13.2 tarballs I found at http://depot-trinity.dotriver.eu/releases/3.5.13.2. Anybody else experience this? I tried playing around with the source code (not really knowing what I am doing) to get beyond the error but that just got me linker errors instead. Building TDE had been going pretty smoothly until this.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

tde-users