tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

3805 discussions

r14 TDE apps not in Wheezy menus, probably Mint also
by Mike Bird 07 Feb '15

07 Feb '15

While looking into a problem on trinity-users I noticed that TDE apps are not present in my Wheezy menus. Judging by the original user report, this is probably the case also in Mint. I had not noticed this before because all the apps my users and I use regularly are either run from panel buttons or else are non-TDE apps such as LibreOffice which are present in menus. It is not immediately obvious to me where the problem lies. Does anyone have any information on this or should I start trying to figure it out? --Mike

2 4

Kdesktop_lock left running
by russell＠lls.lls.com 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hello, We're seeing lots of kdesktop_lock processes left lying around after users have logged out. With the number of users (100+ on some of our systems) and uptimes in years, the process table is going to end up full of these :-( If one does an strace on the process it terminates but not until then. Here's a (partial) pstree of a user with a three hanging kdesktop_lock processes: >dbus-daemon(19522) >dbus-launch(19521) >dcopserver(19574) >kaccess(19656) >kded(19578) >kdeinit(19588)-+-kio_file(8614) > |-klauncher(19591) > |-konqueror(20688) > `-kwin(19633) >kdesktop(19637)---kdesktop_lock(29060) >kdesktop_lock(20636) >kdesktop_lock(22549) >kdesktop_lock(22120) >klipper(19671) >kmix(19674) >knotify(19667) >korgac(19676) >krandrtray(19661) >kicker(19643) >ksmserver(19626) >startkde(19416)-+-gpg-agent(19518) > |-kwrapper(19624) > `-ssh-agent(19517) The 'spurious' kdesktop_locks end up with init as the PPID: >F S UID PID PPID PGID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD >0 S 1051 22549 1 22482 0 80 0 - 7739 - ? 00:00:00 kdesktop_lock Process 22482 (the PGID) doesn't exist. When I do an strace on PID 20636 and I get: >Process 20636 attached - interrupt to quit >--- SIGHUP (Hangup) @ 0 (0) --- >--- SIGTERM (Terminated) @ 0 (0) --- >munmap(0xb5b70000, 172873) = 0 >gettimeofday({1423135382, 387694}, NULL) = 0 >gettimeofday({1423135382, 387815}, NULL) = 0 >exit_group(1) = ? and the kdesktop_lock process is gone. The version is: >Qt: 3.3.8d >KDE: 3.5.13.2 >KDesktop Locker: 2.1 all running on Debian Wheezy. Any suggestions as to how I stop this behaviour? TIA. -- Regards, Russell -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Russell Brown | MAIL: russell(a)lls.com PHONE: 01780 471800 | | Lady Lodge Systems | WWW Work: http://www.lls.com | | Peterborough, England | WWW Play: http://www.ruffle.me.uk | --------------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Re: [trinity-devel] Kdesktop_lock left running
by Jim 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 15:13 (+0000), Russell Brown wrote: > Hello, > We're seeing lots of kdesktop_lock processes left lying around after > users have logged out. With the number of users (100+ on some of our > systems) and uptimes in years, the process table is going to end up full > of these :-( > If one does an strace on the process it terminates but not until then. > Here's a (partial) pstree of a user with a three hanging kdesktop_lock > processes: >>F S UID PID PPID PGID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD >>0 S 1051 22549 1 22482 0 80 0 - 7739 - ? 00:00:00 kdesktop_lock > Process 22482 (the PGID) doesn't exist. That is partially because PGID is not a process id, it is a process group ID. Cheers. Jim

1 0

trinity-dev mailing list web access is frozen (it's winter...)
by Alexandre 05 Feb '15

05 Feb '15

Hi Tim, We're on Feb 5 and there is still now February page on the trinity-dev mailing list web access page. Thank you! -Alexandre

1 0

Downloading Red Hat packaging files
by Darrell 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

I want to download the red hat files from tde-packaging. I tried git clone but the cloning process always stalls at about 66%. Is there a faster way to grab the files? Darrell

2 1

Trinity Desktop on PowerPC
by Jean Milot 31 Jan '15

31 Jan '15

Hello, I would like to install tde on PowerPC. Someone could help me? Sincerely, Jean -- MILOT Jean Tél. : 0659514624 milot.jean(a)gmail.com

2 11

wrong path when uninstalling trinity on Ubuntu 14.04
by Ondrej Riha 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

When uninstalling on Ubuntu 14.04 there are some errors: Removing konsole-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/konsole-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/konsole-tr= inity.prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package konsole-trinity (--purge): podproces nain=B9talovan=FD skript pre-removal vr=E1til chybov=FD k=F3d 12= 7 Removing ksmserver-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ksmserver-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ksmserve= r-trinity.prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package ksmserver-trinity (--purge): podproces nain=B9talovan=FD skript pre-removal vr=E1til chybov=FD k=F3d 12= 7 Removing twin-trinity (4:14.0.0-r1865-0ubuntu14.04.0+pr185) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/twin-trinity.prerm: 22: /var/lib/dpkg/info/twin-trinity.= prerm: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: not found dpkg: error processing package twin-trinity (--purge): podproces installed script pre-removal returned error code 127 There are some errors during uninstall: konsole-trinity ksmserver-trinity twin-trinity There may be some other errors. update-alternatives is in /usr/bin and not in /usr/sbin $ whereis update-alternatives update-alternatives: /usr/bin/update-alternatives /usr/bin/X11/update-alter= natives /usr/share/man/man8/update-alternatives.8.gz Thanks. OR

1 0

Protocol section empty in the Help system
by Michele Calgaro 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 If I open the Help system and look inside the "Protocol" section, I see just a message "Information about the available protocols". I remember that some months ago there used to be a list of the available protocols in the system. I see the same problem both on my system (Jessie, local TDE build) and in a VM machine (Wheezy, official R14.0.0). Is anyone else seeing this? If so I will open a proper bug report. Thanks Michele -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUv1dJAAoJECp1t8qK3tXPTUUQAKs3mtdOuhPf3w6k0x0wxbL/ EPRK8sT17k10vRY8ePIudcMwUZTfxIGHg0GXWORHHybgJfUKUf1K54ATQU2o8Oao 5Y6pwndmd6i2D6m+2VmI4Z95Gokozrx2tylrAzFKFKTI+STyOu3Qbcwg9nlU6EoB B4raV5oRKqx/e9FG2E7MUobXvuF7U2ZXYYXsNVYVeFn8ykbJD8mxNP5jUaFHDIYN zJxC0mtLzd+j7I4dX/CDdqFGdWnXrITOdhh31PnMFhdBnYdC3eeUB/r4Wy77yIF5 GXDBgBZ+S+3Y2Fwla2RrNiCVEEGCVkzUT+uYh/pkwRFTDxoCA02xYDZ87zh+8hXF 0TrmWR6dldl3JU1HFKMPh8bnehwxWN+CgZ0DDGPdc1iy1I+4E/AwDso4+GvAEEn3 g2Kmxe/uy7rVkNtZ+ZkAqT934QFqGhqlsBDQ6UeHtyUuO5H4t2h0Nyy5dWxG1iOm VbGtNmxWWVimZTz848ivfkDwnOlMDu8sBHIoC5R2if/Wk51dawcpCczTtyBG3Pkc +hWs0nAmSBlEymmDfJW8dj4E49WFIK41e0by9VK4t05Zv8A/b+iqDPKPNkQAoBeZ LWe4TnTfhPvdA04i/G7Rsg3DEpiUgJ62nlsfFK7r8kOXOfKuGED20mMmsA1psdX8 JmSozCD3m4xZur59BhBd =78Kj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 4

Codebase formatting discussion
by Timothy Pearson 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224 All, This is a follow-up on point #5 from my post earlier this month entitled "TDE GIT thaw, build farm status, and future direction". > Codebase formatting. While this is not a major problem for the users > I have been tripped up more than once by the fact that some portions of > the codebase (twin among others) use a vastly different style of > indentation and bracing, one that is (IMHO) extremely hard to read and/or > modify. This in turn has therefore contributed to many "fix up prior > commit" commits and/or outright regressions in GIT. I greatly prefer > Stroustrup style formatting with hard tab indentation (no space or > combined space/tab indents) and indented public/protected/private blocks. > This style is highly legible, emphasizes the control flow, and produces a > minimal number of non-whitespace difference lines when an if/else block is > modified. All of the new code (thousands and thousands of lines of it) > that I have contributed to TDE have been in this style. I have been > toying with reformatting the entire TDE codebase in one large commit; if > there are no objections I think this step could greatly improve both our > development speed and the overall quality of the codebase; comments and > discussion are welcome. I would like to start converting over the codebase ASAP. I have an automated tool that will do this, but would like some feedback on the style to convert into as reformatting like this is a one-time operation that will not be repeated for the life of the TDE project. As mentioned above I strongly prefer a modified Stroustrup style formatting. Is this acceptable to the other developers, and if not, what would you rather use and why? Thanks! Tim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iFYEARELAAYFAlSjHncACgkQLaxZSoRZrGF0owDcDGlmwDw7tQ/jTZc+RPsh9Un8 J/p7Qopfm0FmKADdFWqOHlrmHs6p9sl/aPtWa5F3/Zw2JyoE7G6t1A== =/kGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 37

Removal of tde-packaging branch 'suse'
by Slávek Banko 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

Hi all, I propose to remove the branch 'suse' of tde-packaging. This branch is unused / unmaintained and is generally incorrect. For each distribution is intended folder, not a branch. Exactly as are maintained packages for OpenSUSE by François. Therefore I consider branch 'suse' suitable for disposal. Any objections? -- Slávek

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels