said Jim via tde-users: | On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 06:33 (+0000), dep via tde-users wrote: | > On 9/19/25 02:15, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via tde-users users@trinitydesktop.org wrote: | >> Hm ... what makes you want to use anything but xsane? | > | > The desire to get work done, in reasonably high quality. When I scan, | > I generally need to do a substantial number of scans -- say 900 | > negatives in both 35mm and 2 1/4 -- so establishing a workflow is | > important. Using xsane is certainly possible. So would be writing a | > book in KEdit or heaven help us, Kate. | | Just out of curiosity, what workflow features that you find useful are | missing from xsane?
Default path setting, for one. Also, it is just clunky and unpleasant to use. Give Skanlite a shot and you'll see the difference.
| I'm just curious about what things scanners other than xsane provide | that I have (evidently) been missing out on all these years. I don't do | a huge amount of scanning, but if I can be more efficient when I do, | that would be a win.